Fix Solaris 10 Share Nfs Unknown Error TutorialHome > Solaris 10 > Solaris 10 Share Nfs Unknown Error
Solaris 10 Share Nfs Unknown Error
For example, if a client holds a write delegation on a file and a second client opens that file for read or write access, the server recalls the first client's write So far you have no proof that the two systems talk at all. app2 is currently able to mount the shared directories. With root access and knowledge of network programming, anyone can introduce arbitrary data into the network and extract any data from the network. http://unordic.com/solaris-10/solaris-nic-error.html
Clients that cannot support the NFS version 3 protocol with the large file extensions cannot access any large files. If the server's file system is mounted with the -largefiles option, a client can access large files without the need for changes. This error is usually reported as an I/O error to the application. These conditions clear when the delegation conflict has been resolved.
Unfortunately, file locking is extremely slow, compared to NFS traffic without file locking (or file locking on a local Unix disk). Thus, when the server received a request from a client that included a file handle, the resolution was straightforward and the file handle always referred to the correct file. What this means is that a client can update a file, and have the timestamp on the file be either some time long in the past, or even in the future,
Upgrading systems to Solaris 10 11/06 or later does not change the network services as the default is "open". Enabling the NFS client service will restore NFS mounts at boot time. # svcadm Note that one server cannot resolve access conflicts for a file that is stored on another server. Users can log in on any remote computer just as users can log in on a local terminal. I don't claim to understand the logic behind this -- but it works.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Top Best Answer 0 Mark this reply as the best answer?(Choose carefully, this can't be changed) Yes | No Saving... After a successful request, the WebNFS client selects the first security mechanism from the array that the client supports. http://unixadminschool.com/blog/2011/04/solaris10-nfs-nfs-mounts-in-vfstab-fail-to-mount-at-boot/ If the client is enabled for IPv6 and if the IPv6 address for the client's name can be determined, then the callback daemon accepts IPv6 connections.
If you log in to a remote computer (using login, rlogin, or telnet) and use keylogin to gain access, you give access to your account. Top Best Answer 0 Mark this reply as the best answer?(Choose carefully, this can't be changed) Yes | No Saving... File Locking Semantics Programs use file locking to insure that concurrent access to files does not occur except when guaranteed to be safe. For example, if a network partition exists after the server reboots, the client might not be able to reestablish its state with the server before the grace period ends.
I know that there are some problems with Linux shares if version of client is set to 4). https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E36784_01/html/E36825/rfsrefer-134.html For procedural information, refer to How to Select Different Versions of NFS on a Server. No spaces please The Profile Name is already in use Password Notify me of new activity in this group: Real Time Daily Never Keep me informed of the latest: White Papers The IBM pre-sales consultant pointed this out.
victorkwan 270001M1W7 9 Posts Re: Mounting partition from AIX 6.1 onto Solaris 10 2011-03-25T01:51:00Z This is the accepted answer. The following message appears during the boot process or in response to an explicit mount request, and indicates that an accessible server is not running the NFS server daemons. our system guy mounted the same share to another aix machine with only mount command, and it worked perfectly.... this content Thanks Reply Link Nicola September 12, 2012, 11:54 am I got same issue (mount.nfs: Stale NFS file handle) the first time I've attempted to mount a shared folder.
To resolve this problem, the NFS version 4 protocol permits a server to declare that its file handles are volatile. It varies from system to system which of these mechanisms work with NFS. The NFS version 3 protocol that uses UDP is given higher precedence than the NFS version 2 protocol that is using TCP.
For example, if a network partition exists after the server reboots, the client might not be able to re-establish its state with the server before the grace period ends.
For example: For NFS Version 3, the server returns the JUKEBOX error, which causes the client to halt the access request and try again later. The Oracle Solaris NFS version 4 server fully implements these file-sharing modes. A common approach to network security problems is to leave the solution to each application. If this is not happening then your NFS configuration is broken.
The NFS version 3 protocol has an unlimited transfer size. Top Best Answer 0 Mark this reply as the best answer?(Choose carefully, this can't be changed) Yes | No Saving... An NFS server cannot initiate recalls for clients that are running earlier versions of NFS. have a peek at these guys Both the client and the server maintain current information about the open files and file locks.
Privacy - Terms of Service - Questions or Comments Home Forums Posting Rules Linux Help & Resources Fedora Set-Up Guides Fedora Magazine Ask Fedora Fedora Project Fedora Project Links The Fedora A snoop trace for this transaction follows.client -> server PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100005 (MOUNT) vers=3 proto=UDP server -> client PORTMAP R GETPORT port=33492 client -> server MOUNT3 C Null server -> Be carefull with to much manual editing of settings and other various OS configurations. Delegation is a technique by which the server delegates the management of a file to a client.
I just apply it at the parent directory of the one causing the error. When a server crashes and is rebooted, the server loses its state. For example, if client_versmax=4 and client_versmin=2, then the client attempts version 4 first, then version 3, and finally version 2. On other systems, the results are less consistent.