Repair Socket Error 5875 (Solved)

Home > Socket Error > Socket Error 5875

Socket Error 5875

GBiz is too! Latest News Stories: Docker 1.0Heartbleed Redux: Another Gaping Wound in Web Encryption UncoveredThe Next Circle of Hell: Unpatchable SystemsGit 2.0.0 ReleasedThe Linux Foundation Announces Core Infrastructure Enable and require mutual authentication is checked The authentication works fine. CONTINUE READING Join & Write a Comment Already a member? Depending on the Unix variant (AIX, HPUX, Solaris, or Linux family) the implementation is slightly different.

However in the DSTRACE Screen I get the following errors as > I log off. If not, try downloading it from In ConsoleOne there is also a certificate issuing tool that might not give you the error. 0 Message Author Comment by:jdsiam2008-04-03 I have It happens that if any other attributes are wrong on the user, for example a loginShell pointing at an AIX specific shell that was not installed on Linux by default, and Env : 1.

Maybe TID 10093750 applies ? -- Cheers, Edward Akos Szechy13-Sep-2006, 06:56Hi Peter, Normally this indicates that the client didn't close the connection properly, so the LDAP server did... Error stack: [2006/09/13 9:11:56.277] Monitor 0x5494fbb0 found connection 0x4e0daf38 socket failure, err = -5875, 0 of 0 bytes read [2006/09/13 9:11:56.277] Monitor 0x5494fbb0 initiating close for connection 0x4e0daf38 [2006/09/13 9:11:56.277] Server The remote system where I am working is having VISTA as the OS.

  • I put in a Novell Support case, but they've been slow on their game (grr, what are we paying for?) to respond via e-mail.
  • Reply With Quote « Previous Thread | Next Thread » Bookmarks Bookmarks Twitter Facebook Google Digg StumbleUpon Posting Permissions You may not post new threads You may not post replies
  • I found TID 10089842 and a couple of others and have been unsuccessful in getting the connection to occur.
  • Article by: Shakshi Microservice architecture adoption brings many advantages, but can add intricacy.
  • For example, I wanted to allow only some people access to AOL instant messenger (AIM).
  • I tried a number of things.
  • There was some added complexity over time, such that the passwords (hashed of course) which used to be stored in the /etc/passwd file itself, they got moved into the shadow password

Well that is easy to fix. Loading... You can get the IANA-provided two-letter TLD codes for all countries here: An alternative solution for this particular problem is remove the port rules, and configure AIM to use the HTTP proxy.

Error stack: error:14094412:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert bad certificate - SSL alert number 42 LDAP: [2005/11/23 12:50:06] ( TLS handshake failed on connection 0x6560700, err = -5875 LDAP: [2005/11/23 12:50:06] Server closing connection Let us know so we can fix it. Java Programming Languages-Other Advertise Here 746 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days. Site policy | Privacy | Contact Skip to main content Skip to search Main Menu home Download & Extend Community Documentation Support Jobs Marketplace About Return to Content Search form

Please let me know the steps which I am missing. MenuExperts Exchange Browse BackBrowse Topics Open Questions Open Projects Solutions Members Articles Videos Courses Contribute Products BackProducts Gigs Live Courses Vendor Services Groups Careers Store Headlines Website Testing Ask a Question The solution takes some of out-of-the-box thinking; read on! .NET Programming C# Databases Orchestrating microservices on AWS for solution design – What’s next? Error stack: > error:14094418:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert unknown ca > - SSL alert number 48 > LDAP: [2005/11/23 10:59:53] ( TLS handshake > failed on connection 0x53c7ee0, err = -5875 > LDAP:

This is really an easy thing to set up and configure, and very straightforward. Pluggable Authentication Modules. Could you try doing the same bind with ldapsearch? Netware 6.5 SP6 eDir set dstrace =+LDAP reuslts shown below Monitor 0x256 initiating TLS handshake on connection 0x88d5b9a0 DoTLSHandshake on connection 0x88d5b9a0 TLS accept failure 1 on connection 0x88d5b9a0, setting

When the 1. have a peek at these guys But, there are other situations where it would be handier if port rules worked. I thought I recalled that access rules and port filters worked together. For a long variety of reasons, this particular tree happened to have the Domain Services for Windows schema included, and it looks like that or something else extended base schema so

Still getting the same 669 error on login, so I tried what my other tree had shown in the Simple Password sequence, which was just the one, and it looks like Let's Talk Products & Solutions Support & Services Partners Communities About Free Downloads Shop × × Sorry for the inconvenience Our new site design is only available in English right now. It is the version of LDAP config, the field "ldapConfigVersion" shown in the "other" tab of ConsoleOne. check over here It looks like the implementation you're using is openldap (as noted by the Client certificate = required) In your openldap config file, you should be able to switch to TLS then

This is because the file cacerts in $JAVA_HOME\jre\lib\security\ contains the public certificates of all the popular CAs like VeriSign, Entrust and Thawte. Turns out all that troubleshooting is interesting and a useful exercise it turns out to be completely unrelated to anything! I played with it all day and couldn't get it to work until I added the starting context to the LDAP config screen.Average of ratings: - Permalink | Show parent |

We receive a -5875 in the DSTrace.

I get the following error when trying to connect [Tue Apr 17 22:47:50 2007] [warn] [client] [3372] auth_ldap authenticate: user tonyg authentication failed; URI / [LDAP: ldap_simple_bind_s() failed][Unavailable] this is Covered by US Patent. Go to the previous site to read in my language Stay here and read in English × Give Us Feedback Got some feedback about the website? Does your server accept non-encrypted bind?

This can be a real PIA to troubleshoot. Next error we see is a little bit later: 13:28:02 7D569BA0 NMAS: 54: PWD LSM: Calling verifyPassword 13:28:02 7D569BA0 NMAS: 54: Server Module 0x00000009 Get Password 13:28:02 7D569BA0 NMAS: 54: Server However in the DSTRACE Screen I get the following errors as I log off. this content Error stack: > error:14094412:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert bad > certificate - SSL alert number 42 > LDAP: [2005/11/23 12:50:06] ( TLS handshake > failed on connection 0x6560700, err = -5875 > LDAP:

This is great because you basically just point your Unix or Linux servers or desktops at eDirectory. Is this a problem? > > Thanks for any advice > > Pete > > [2006/09/13 9:11:52.768] Monitor 0x5494fbb0 found connection 0x8390730 > socket failure, err = -5875, 0 of 0 Error stack: error:140890C7:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:peer did not return a certificate 16:35:34 B4F0 LDAP: ( TLS handshake failed on connection 0x14b8f60, err = -5875 16:35:34 B4F0 LDAP: BIO ctrl called with unknown However, while running it is throwing the following error. "An unexpected error has occurred.

If you need any other info please let me know and I'll see if I can get what you need.Thanks,GregAverage of ratings: - Permalink | ReplyRe: LDAP Authentication with TLS and It looks like either NMAS or LDAP knows how to recognize a pam_ldap authentication attempt, and the user it finds, MUST have the Auxiliary class posixAccount added to the users Object We are having problems connecting with desktop based LDAP > browser or any other LDAP connection. > > I found TID 10089842 and a couple of others and have been unsuccessful Your traffic should still be encrypted, but the strict validation will be disabled (expired certs will be ok, etc).

What this means is that there is an API (Application Programing Interface) that someone writing a tool on Linux that authenticates would use to handle authentication and authorization events. We receive a -5875 in the DSTrace. > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > Regards, > > > Aldo Zanoni > > > - - - - - - eDirectory can handle the load, and if you are finding you are generating too much traffic it is the work of but moments to add additional replicas just to serve the At no point did we recreate our CA or any > server certificate. > > The server name is MAIL-01.

For no ryhme nor reason, two days ago, we startedgetting>> LDAP/SSL problems. Copy-paste the contents of the [filename_for_the_CSR]. Still it is throwing the error. Client certificate = required the following error occurs.