How To Fix Smtp Extended Error Codes (Solved)

Home > Error Codes > Smtp Extended Error Codes

Smtp Extended Error Codes


Example: 451 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified. (in reply to RCPT TO command) There is an implicit rule in RFC 2821 for these cases that suggests that any SMTP Server in For Internet mail names, this means the address portion to the right of the "@" is invalid for mail. Reply scott Staff 40,028 Points 2015-10-19 5:38 pm Hello Mildred, Our shared servers are hard set to only allow 50 recipients per email. This code is useful only with temporary errors.

Vaudreuil IESG X.4.YYY Network and Routing Status The networking or routing codes report status about the delivery system itself. Clients should preserve the extensibility of the code space by reporting the general error described in the subject sub-code when the specific detail is unrecognized. This may also be a permanent error if the sender has indicated that conversion with loss is prohibited for the message. Since the error is thrown when validating the destination address, the conclusion would be that the destination address contains invalid arguments.

Smtp Server Response Codes

System issues are assumed to be under the general control of the destination system administrator. [RFC3463] (Standards track) G. SMTP reply codes See rfc2821 for the basic specification of SMTP; see also rfc1123 for important additional information. This value applies to all of the “subject” values. Security Considerations ......................................13 Appendix A - Collected Status Codes ..........................14 Appendix B - Changes from RFC1893 ............................15 Author's Address .............................................15 Full Copyright Statement .....................................16 Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 3463

X.5.5 Wrong protocol version A protocol version mis-match existed which could not be automatically resolved by the communicating parties. 3.7 Message Content or Message Media Status X.6.0 Other or undefined media This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING X.3.5 System incorrectly configured The system is not configured in a manner that will permit it to accept this message. Enhanced Status Code Exchange 2010 This can occur in gateways when features from one domain cannot be mapped onto the supported feature in another. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G.

The general semantics implies that the recipient can delete messages to make more space available. Example: C> RSET S> 250 2.0.0 user Resetting or S> 250 2.0.0 Resetting This code is very common after the execution of the RSET command. Reply swetha n/a Points 2014-12-15 2:33 am 404 not found, its clear explanation, can't access the webmail login page Reply scott Staff 40,028 Points 2014-12-15 12:09 pm Hello Swetha, 404 Reply codes in numerical order Code Meaning 200 (nonstandard success response, see rfc876) 211 System status, or system help reply 214 Help message 220 Service ready 221 Service closing

Sending the same mail in the future may end in a successful delivery. Smtp Codes 240 X.4.5   Mail system congestion The mail system was unable to deliver the message because the mail system was congested.  This is useful only as a persistent transient error. Its definition according to the RFC is the following:       2.XXX.XXX   Success Success means the DSN is reporting a successful delivery. Proudly powered by WordPress {{offlineMessage}} Store Store home Devices Microsoft Surface PCs & tablets Xbox Virtual reality Accessories Windows phone Software Office Windows Additional software Apps All apps Windows apps Windows

  • X.1.1 Bad destination mailbox address The mailbox specified in the address does not exist.
  • Melnikov IESG X.7.16 Message is too big for the specified priority 552 (other 4XX or 5XX codes are allowed) The message is too big for the specified priority.
  • Edited the text to make it spell-checker and grammar checker compliant.

Smtp Error Codes 550

This is useful only as a permanent error. Used in place of 5.7.1 as described in Section 8.4 of [RFC7208]. [RFC7372] (Standards Track); [RFC7208] (Standards Track) M. Smtp Server Response Codes X.5.3 Too many recipients More recipients were specified for the message than could have been delivered by the protocol. Smtp Status Codes 240 X.5.2 Syntax error A mail transaction protocol command was issued which could not be interpreted, either because the syntax was wrong or the command is unrecognized.

Updated required standards boilerplate. This is useful only as a permanent error. Vaudreuil IESG X.5.2 Syntax error 500, 501, 502, 550, 555 A mail transaction protocol command was issued which could not be interpreted, either because the syntax was wrong or the command This code is useful only with permanent errors. Smtp Error Codes Rfc

Vaudreuil IESG X.2.3 Message length exceeds administrative limit 552 A per-mailbox administrative message length limit has been exceeded. Each numeric sub-code within the status-code MUST be expressed without leading zero digits. This code is only useful for permanent failures. navigate here Are there different types of bounce codes?

This error should normally result in the segmentation of the message into two, the remainder of the recipients to be delivered on a subsequent delivery attempt. Smtp Bounce Codes Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 X.2.4 Mailing list expansion problem The mailbox is a mailing list address and the mailing list was In this case, the client SHOULD ask the user to supply new credentials (such as by presenting a password dialog box). [RFC4954] (Standards Track) R.

Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 16] Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.119, available from Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Enhanced Status Codes Registry Created 2008-05-29 Last Updated 2015-08-24 Available Formats XML

Example: C> MAIL FROM:[email protected] SIZE=9999999999 S> 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds file system imposed limit In this case no action from the sender or recipient can result in a successful delivery These system components include any necessary infrastructure such as directory and routing services. X.5.1 Invalid command A mail transaction protocol command was issued which was either out of sequence or unsupported. Enhanced Status Code Transport Rule If this code accompanies a delivery failure report, sending in the future may be successful. [RFC3463] (Standards track) G.

Used in place of 4.4.3 or 5.5.2 as described in Sections 8.6 and 8.7 of [RFC7208]. [RFC7372] (Standards Track); [RFC7208] (Standards Track) M. A revision to the SMTP theory of reply codes to better distribute the error conditions in the number space will necessarily be incompatible with SMTP. Example: 421 4.7.0 Error: too many errors X.7.1   Delivery not authorized, message refused The sender is not authorized to send mail to the specified destination. his comment is here Vaudreuil IESG X.1.5 Destination address valid 250 This mailbox address as specified was valid.

A DNS lookup returning only an SOA (Start of Administration) record for a domain name is one example of the unable to route error. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G. For the remaining recipients rejected by this error, the mail is still under the responsibility of the SMTP Client so the mail should be queued to retry the delivery for the Kucherawy IESG X.7.22 No valid author-matched DKIM signature found 550 This status code is returned when a message contains one or more passing DKIM signatures, but none are acceptable because none Siemborski, A.

If you receive an email bounce, you can look in the bounce message to find the proper error code that will give you the reason for the bounce. The possible values of “detail” are: 3.1 Undefined and other status X.0.0   Any undefined status This is the only undefined status. Check the RFC index for further mail-related RFCs. Hansen, J.

If possible, the code for the actual problem found when delivery was attempted should be returned rather than this code. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G. Vaudreuil IESG X.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused 451, 454, 502, 503, 533, 550, 551 The sender is not authorized to send to the destination. In combination with other information provided in the Delivery Status Notification (DSN) delivery report, these codes facilitate media and language independent rendering of message delivery status. It should be used for all errors for which only the class of the error is known. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G.

X.7.X Security or Policy Status The security or policy status codes report failures involving policies such as per-recipient or per-host filtering and cryptographic operations. This can apply to any field in the address. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G. Example: C> MAIL FROM: S> 450 4.1.8 : Sender address rejected: Domain not found These kind of errors may happen when the SMTP Server has a filter like the PTR record