How To Repair Smtp Enhanced Error Codes (Solved)

Home > Error Codes > Smtp Enhanced Error Codes

Smtp Enhanced Error Codes


X.7.4 Security features not supported A message contained security features such as secure authentication that could not be supported on the delivery protocol. Vaudreuil IESG X.4.5 Mail system congestion 451 The mail system was unable to deliver the message because the mail system was congested. X.3.3   System not capable of selected features Selected features specified for the message are not supported by the destination system.  This can occur in gateways when features from one domain cannot This code usually comes in the non-delivery-response report.

This status code should be used when the per-mailbox message length limit is less than the general system limit. Reference: A reference to the document in which the code is defined. Vaudreuil IESG X.2.1 Mailbox disabled, not accepting messages Not given The mailbox exists, but is not accepting messages. This status code should be used for positive delivery reports. check these guys out

Smtp Reply Codes

System issues are assumed to be under the general control of the destination system administrator. Authentication required 531 - Mail system Full 533 - Remote server has insufficient disk space to hold email 534 - Authentication mechanism is too weak. the list above says this is an system storage issue. Vaudreuil IESG X.5.4 Invalid command arguments 451, 501, 502, 503, 504, 550, 555 A valid mail transaction protocol command was issued with invalid arguments, either because the arguments were out of

Overview There is a need for a standard mechanism for the reporting of mail system errors richer than the limited set offered by SMTP and the system specific text descriptions sent The comments of the participants in those efforts are gratefully acknowledged, particularly the members of the [email protected] mailing list. Vaudreuil, J. Smtp Codes 240 Kucherawy IESG X.7.18 Domain owner has changed 5XX This status code is returned when a message is received with a Require-Recipient-Valid-Since field or RRVS extension and the receiving system wishes to

We had it checked. It might become your favorite. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or Melnikov IESG X.7.10 Encryption Needed 523 This indicates that external strong privacy layer is needed in order to use the requested authentication mechanism.

This RFC defines such an IANA registry and was written to help prevent further conflicts from appearing in the future. Enhanced Status Code Transport Rule The components of this system may include any necessary infrastructure like directory and routing services. X.4.3 Directory server failure The network system was unable to forward the message, because a directory server was unavailable. The first number is the email message status.

Smtp Status Codes 240

If you are maintaining the IP address and email server for your installation, then I would highly recommend reviewing the bounce messages when your emails fail. Note that this response code is documented here for historical purposes only. Smtp Reply Codes This can be caused by a non existent email address, DNS problem, or your email was blocked by the receiving server. Smtp Error Codes 550 Message too large 530 - Access Denied.

greetings from Argentina. his comment is here There are no associated detail sub-code values for the class and subject sub-code tables. References ...................................................13 5. In combination with other information provided in the Delivery Status Notification (DSN) delivery report, these codes facilitate media and language independent rendering of message delivery status. Enhanced Status Code Exchange 2010

  1. X.5.3   Too many recipients More recipients were specified for the message than could have been delivered by the protocol.
  2. This is useful only as a permanent error.
  3. Registration Updates Standards-track registrations may be updated if the relevant standards are updated as a consequence of that action.
  4. The three portions are known as the class sub- code, the subject sub-code, and the detail sub-code.
  5. X.4.3  Directory server failure The mail system was unable to deliver this mail because there was no name resolution service available.
  6. Notes: The traditional SMTP bounce codes are three-digit numbers (e.g., 550).
  7. Vaudreuil IESG X.6.YYY Message Content or Media Status The message content or media status codes report failures involving the content of the message.
  8. These status codes are used for media and language independent status reporting.
  9. This is useful only as a permanent error.
  10. February 2014 at 17:49 Jody, What email provider do you use?

This is useful only as a permanent error. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G. Such prohibitions may be the expression of the sender in the message itself or the policy of the sending host. Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 X.7.6 Cryptographic algorithm not supported A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt a message was this contact form X.1.7   Bad sender mailbox address syntax The sender’s address has a bad syntax.

Vaudreuil IESG X.5.6 Authentication Exchange line is too long 500 This enhanced status code SHOULD be returned when the server fails the AUTH command due to the client sending a [BASE64] Smtp Error Codes Rfc Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 2. You can also find resources online for more information about individual bounce codes.

smtp error [221] 2.0.0 bye what does this mean & how do i sort it?

The meaning of this value applies the same for any of the three types of classes defined above. These failures include the full range of problems resulting from implementation errors or an unreliable connection. [RFC3463] (Standards track) G. This condition might be temporary, for example the server is operating in a mode where only higher priority messages below certain size are accepted for transfer and delivery. [RFC6710] (Standards Track) Smtp Code 334 Table of Contents 1.

Sending the same mail in the future may end in a successful delivery. All Rights Reserved. This may also have a value such as "Any" or "Not given". and X.5.6, X.7.8, X.7.9, X.7.11, and X.7.12, found in section 6 of [RFC4954] (using the text from X.5.6, 5.7.8, 5.7.9, 5.7.11, and 4.7.12).

Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 X.1.6 Destination mailbox has moved, No forwarding address The mailbox address provided was at one time valid, Kucherawy IESG X.7.21 No acceptable DKIM signature found 550 This status code is returned when a message contains one or more passing DKIM signatures, but none are acceptable. (This violates the It may include address syntax or validity. The following is an extract from RFC 3463, where a definition for this new SMTP Protocol feature is given:    SMTP error codes have historically been used for reporting mail system

X.4.5   Mail system congestion The mail system was unable to deliver the message because the mail system was congested.  This is useful only as a persistent transient error. Kucherawy IESG X.7.22 No valid author-matched DKIM signature found 550 This status code is returned when a message contains one or more passing DKIM signatures, but none are acceptable because none An example of an entry in the enumerated status code table would be: Code: X.0.0 Sample Text: Other undefined Status Associated basic status code: Any Description: Other undefined status is the Enhanced Status Codes (Class Sub-Codes) (from Code Summary Description Reference 2.XXX.YYY Success Success specifies that the DSN is reporting a positive delivery action.

Suggestion help.. It looks like there are no questions about this page. Using the email address as key 2. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Vaudreuil, "An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications", RFC 3464, January 2003. 5. We will automatically opt-out prospects who have had a hard bounce.